Just when global supply chain managers thought they could catch a breath, the rare earth markets are sending another warning signal. This week, Reuters reported that the U.S. and China are considering extending a truce on rare earth export curbs during a leaders’ summit. On the surface, that sounds like stability.
But as the old saying goes, the devil is in the details—specifically, the customs data.
According to the Reuters analysis, while total rare earth export volumes have mostly rebounded, Beijing is still quietly throttling the specialty heavy rare earths. We are talking about yttrium, dysprosium, and terbium—elements that are anything but ordinary. Exports of these critical materials are still down 50% compared to pre-control levels.
As one consultant noted in the piece, “Headline export volumes can be misleading.”

The “Legacy” of Leverage
The Reuters article highlights a startling reality: the controls imposed back in April 2025 (in retaliation for tariffs) have become a lasting legacy. Even as diplomats smile for the cameras, U.S. aerospace companies have paused production, and allies like Germany and Japan are being cut off even more drastically than the U.S.
Prices for yttrium have soared 140-fold. Dysprosium and terbium are seeing 4x to 5x price hikes outside of China.
Why is this happening? The article suggests China is “selectively licensing” exports to preserve leverage over defense and advanced tech supply chains. It notes that a senior U.S. official admitted conversations with Beijing are ongoing, and that shortages “continue to be a problem.”
But reading between the lines, a deeper question emerges: How can China selectively throttle supply so precisely that it simultaneously pressures the U.S., Japan, and Germany—all without triggering a complete trade collapse?
Where to Find the Deeper Answer
The Reuters piece masterfully documents the symptoms: the shortages, the price spikes, the quiet diplomatic scrambles. But understanding the root cause—the actual mechanism of control—requires looking beyond trade policy to the laboratory, the patent office, and the industrial floor.
That is precisely the question our recent GEI report sought to answer. “China’s Rare Earth & Magnet Production Dominance: Technology, Processing & Strategic Control” examines the technological engine room behind the headlines.
Consider what the export data doesn’t show:
- Processing supremacy: China didn’t win this industry through geology. It holds only 36% of global reserves but 90% of refining capacity. The report details the proprietary solvent extraction technology that makes this possible—recovery rates exceeding 95% for heavy rare earths, versus 70-75% in Western facilities.
- Patent thickets: While trade negotiators haggle over licensing terms, Chinese entities have quietly filed for 68% of active rare earth processing patents globally. In critical areas like magnet grain boundary diffusion—a technology that reduces the need for those scarce heavy rare earths—China holds over 85% of IP. You cannot build an alternative supply chain if the fundamental methods are legally blocked.
- Industrial clustering: The Reuters piece notes that replacement of Chinese supply is “still years away.” The GEI report quantifies why: China has concentrated its rare earth industry into three integrated clusters (Baotou, Ganzhou, Ningbo) where refining, metal production, magnet manufacturing, and end-user industries all sit within a 200km radius. That isn’t just efficiency—it’s a structural advantage the West cannot replicate without decades of coordinated investment.

The Uncomfortable Outlook
The Reuters reporting concludes with a sobering forecast from consultancy Project Blue: “The situation looks set to get worse before getting any better.”
Our own analysis supports that view. Even with aggressive Western investment—the 2.5billion MP Materials expansion in the U.S., the 1.8 billion Lynas project in Australia—China’s share of global refining capacity is projected to remain above 75% through 2030. Faster permitting cycles, lower cost of state financing, and fully amortized infrastructure create a moat that no single trade truce can bridge.
The rare earth game was never about the rocks. It was always about the reactors, the reagents, and the refinement. That is where the real leverage lives—and that is where the conversation needs to go.
For a deeper dive into the technology, patents, and processing advantages that underpin China’s rare earth dominance, GEI’s full report is available here.